IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henri Spoof Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-19 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 49 20 28 48 0.980 0.2761 0.2616 0.7931 0.7513
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 12 2 0 2 0.167
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 6 1 3 4 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2024-25 · SUNY Geneseo
+197.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12291
Forward overall
#427
Forward born in 2003
#52
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Ratzloff
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vince Perreault
Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.