← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Ratzloff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester John Marshall High USHS-MN 25 1 6 7 0.280 0.0354 0.0359 0.0680 0.0689
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 47 15 27 42 0.894 0.1121 0.1100 0.2821 0.2767
2018-19 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 45 27 57 84 1.867 0.2343 0.2175 0.5893 0.5470
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Augsburg D1 MIAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Augsburg D1 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18289
Forward overall
#863
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2015-16
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.