IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Ratzloff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester John Marshall High USHS-MN 25 1 6 7 0.280 0.0754 0.0764 0.0680 0.0689
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 47 15 27 42 0.894 0.1077 0.1057 0.2823 0.2769
2018-19 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 45 27 57 84 1.867 0.2249 0.2088 0.5897 0.5474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27045
Forward overall
#1133
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luc Boby
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Holm
Northland · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Chakeen
UMass Boston · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.