IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Swain Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Rockets EHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1155 0.1209 0.2447 0.2561
2014-15 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 42 17 34 51 1.214 0.2028 0.1978 0.5055 0.4930
2015-16 — EHL 25 4 11 15 0.600 0.1386 0.1325 0.2936 0.2807
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Neumann D1 MAC SR 7 3 2 5 0.714
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC — 7 3 2 5 0.714
2018-19 Neumann D1 MAC JR 14 5 2 7 0.500
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC — 14 5 2 7 0.500
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC — 21 12 7 19 0.905
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2017-18 · Neumann
+566.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22457
Forward overall
#848
Forward born in 1995
#529
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Faiz Khan
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jerad Tafoya
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Selan
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.