← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jerad Tafoya Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 43 7 9 16 0.372 0.1382 0.1439
2012-13 NAHL 38 6 6 12 0.316 0.1173 0.1163
2013-14 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 8 15 23 0.390 0.1447 0.1362 0.4127 0.3884
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 SR 21 7 7 14 0.667
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 JR 25 5 11 16 0.640
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 SO 20 2 8 10 0.500
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 FR 28 11 9 20 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2014-15 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+550.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30628
Forward overall
#1196
Forward born in 1993
#3674
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.