IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jerad Tafoya Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 43 7 9 16 0.372 0.1367 0.1424 — —
2012-13 — NAHL 38 6 6 12 0.316 0.1160 0.1150 — —
2013-14 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 8 15 23 0.390 0.1432 0.1348 0.4114 0.3872
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 21 7 7 14 0.667
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 25 5 11 16 0.640
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 20 2 8 10 0.500
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 28 11 9 20 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2014-15 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+557.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37563
Forward overall
#1344
Forward born in 1993
#3893
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Raver
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Czarnecki
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Mauro
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.