| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Wenatchee Wild | NAHL | 43 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.372 | 0.1382 | 0.1439 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | — | NAHL | 38 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.316 | 0.1173 | 0.1163 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Amarillo Wranglers | NAHL | 59 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 0.390 | 0.1447 | 0.1362 | 0.4127 | 0.3884 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | SR | 21 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.667 |
| 2016-17 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2015-16 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | SO | 20 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.500 |
| 2014-15 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | FR | 28 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 0.714 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.