← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Mauro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 21 7 12 19 0.905 0.2301 0.2301 0.3754 0.3754
2021-22 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 53 18 23 41 0.774 0.2324 0.2492 0.5295 0.5679
2022-23 Sudbury Wolves OHL 29 2 3 5 0.172 0.1000 0.1003 0.4418 0.4431
2023-24 Sudbury Wolves OHL 38 0 1 1 0.026 0.0153 0.0146 0.0674 0.0644
2024-25 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 52 25 35 60 1.154 0.3466 0.3182 0.7898 0.7251
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+97.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30510
Forward overall
#1809
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.