← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Czarnecki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Valley Jr. Warriors EHLP 42 26 12 38 0.905 0.0708 0.0716 0.2043 0.2067
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 31 8 10 18 0.581 0.1246 0.1260 0.2843 0.2874
2017-18 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 42 26 28 54 1.286 0.1731 0.1624 0.4377 0.4106
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 26 5 1 6 0.231
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 FR 20 3 3 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+137.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27361
Forward overall
#1200
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.