← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jody Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0542 0.0604 0.1934 0.2155
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 56 8 7 15 0.268 0.0581 0.0593 0.2073 0.2115
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 6 11 17 0.283 0.0614 0.0598 0.2192 0.2135
2015-16 CCHL 59 31 30 61 1.034 0.2243 0.2077 0.7999 0.7406
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 SR 27 6 6 12 0.444
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 27 6 6 12 0.444
2018-19 Oswego D1 JR 23 7 1 8 0.348
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 23 7 1 8 0.348
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 22 3 3 6 0.273
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 20 5 3 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+214.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28662
Forward overall
#1119
Forward born in 1995
#613
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2024-25
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.