IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jody Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0713 0.0795 0.1935 0.2156
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 56 8 7 15 0.268 0.0765 0.0781 0.2074 0.2116
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 6 11 17 0.283 0.0809 0.0788 0.2193 0.2136
2015-16 — CCHL 59 31 30 61 1.034 0.2951 0.2732 0.8003 0.7410
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 27 6 6 12 0.444
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 23 7 1 8 0.348
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 22 3 3 6 0.273
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 20 5 3 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+139.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23302
Forward overall
#926
Forward born in 1995
#736
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nathan Garnier
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Ratzloff
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.