IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kim Hilmersson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-24 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Seacoast Spartans EHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2310 0.2590 0.4893 0.5485
2022-23 Maine Nordiques NAHL 51 6 9 15 0.294 0.1081 0.1136 0.3104 0.3263
2023-24 — NAHL 53 14 9 23 0.434 0.1595 0.1600 0.4581 0.4596
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 54 23 24 47 0.870 0.3198 0.3041 0.9187 0.8736
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 27 8 15 23 0.852
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2025-26 · Plymouth State
+303.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22482
Forward overall
#1239
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cade DeStefani
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Zak
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.