IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Remenda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-05-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 King Rebellion OJHL 44 17 24 41 0.932 0.2603 0.2555 0.6430 0.6311
2001-02 — OJHL 45 16 19 35 0.778 0.2173 0.2021 0.5368 0.4992
2002-03 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 47 30 33 63 1.340 0.3745 0.3328 0.9250 0.8219
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 24 7 9 16 0.667
2005-06 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 24 10 9 19 0.792
2004-05 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 25 5 7 12 0.480
2003-04 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 29 10 9 19 0.655
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2003-04 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+172.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10565
Forward overall
#390
Forward born in 1982
#490
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Soik
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.