← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hassan Akl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 43 5 11 16 0.372 0.1248 0.1335 0.3443 0.3682
2019-20 Surrey Eagles BCHL 28 2 3 5 0.179 0.0688 0.0688 0.2599 0.2599
2020-21 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 14 9 11 20 1.429 0.4792 0.4792 1.3220 1.3220
2021-22 AJHL 58 11 40 51 0.879 0.2949 0.2724 0.8137 0.7516
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 32 13 26 39 1.219
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 30 13 39 52 1.733
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 27 5 18 23 0.852
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 29 6 21 27 0.931
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2022-23 · Aurora
+401.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16303
Forward overall
#766
Forward born in 2001
#311
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.