← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keegan Milligan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0732 0.0796 0.2154 0.2341
2014-15 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 33 0 3 3 0.091 0.0350 0.0360 0.1323 0.1362
2015-16 Melville Millionaires SJHL 58 10 25 35 0.603 0.1546 0.1523 0.4548 0.4481
2016-17 SJHL 60 18 40 58 0.967 0.2477 0.2317 0.7287 0.6818
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA JR 27 5 6 11 0.407
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 5 6 11 0.407
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 NCHA SO 30 9 11 20 0.667
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 30 9 11 20 0.667
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 32 12 13 25 0.781
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2017-18 · St. Norbert
+356.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28395
Forward overall
#1168
Forward born in 1996
#505
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.