← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keegan Milligan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0825 0.0897 0.2151 0.2338
2014-15 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 33 0 3 3 0.091 0.0354 0.0365 0.1326 0.1365
2015-16 Melville Millionaires SJHL 58 10 25 35 0.603 0.1743 0.1717 0.4542 0.4475
2016-17 SJHL 60 18 40 58 0.967 0.2793 0.2613 0.7277 0.6808
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 5 6 11 0.407
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 30 9 11 20 0.667
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 32 12 13 25 0.781
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2017-18 · St. Norbert
+304.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21428
Forward overall
#891
Forward born in 1996
#627
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.