← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Michaud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 49 22 33 55 1.122 0.3371 0.3739 0.9245 1.0254
2015-16 USHL 57 7 8 15 0.263 0.1676 0.1694 0.7887 0.7971
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 27 46 73 1.659 0.4982 0.5039 1.3666 1.3821
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 18 26 44 0.917 0.2583 0.2448 0.7422 0.7035
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 25 9 14 23 0.920
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 26 8 25 33 1.269
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 28 10 15 25 0.893
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2018-19 · Trinity
+199.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9521
Forward overall
#372
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.