← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob Sgarbossa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0329 0.0358 0.0812 0.0884
2003-04 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 43 11 21 32 0.744 0.2079 0.2170 0.5136 0.5361
2004-05 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 49 11 25 36 0.735 0.2053 0.2039 0.5070 0.5037
2005-06 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 47 11 37 48 1.021 0.2854 0.2730 0.7048 0.6742
2006-07 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 47 14 23 37 0.787 0.2199 0.1993 0.5432 0.4924
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 7 11 18 0.720
2009-10 Morrisville D3 JR 26 8 13 21 0.808
2008-09 Morrisville D3 SO 25 3 14 17 0.680
2007-08 Morrisville D3 FR 25 12 10 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2007-08 · Morrisville
+349.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15929
Forward overall
#638
Forward born in 1986
#1018
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2004-05
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.