| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 47 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.128 | 0.0364 | 0.0388 | 0.0989 | 0.1054 |
| 2007-08 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 57 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.210 | 0.0601 | 0.0612 | 0.1629 | 0.1658 |
| 2008-09 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 57 | 20 | 21 | 41 | 0.719 | 0.2053 | 0.1969 | 0.5568 | 0.5340 |
| 2009-10 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 62 | 36 | 40 | 76 | 1.226 | 0.3498 | 0.3193 | 0.9489 | 0.8662 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | SO | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2010-11 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | FR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.