← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike McPherson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 11 3 1 4 0.364 0.0780 0.0820 0.1781 0.1871
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 48 35 29 64 1.333 0.2861 0.2877 0.6529 0.6565
2017-18 Navan Grads CCHL 24 9 16 25 1.042 0.2973 0.2726 0.8064 0.7393
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 24 6 17 23 0.958
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 8 2 8 10 1.250
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 26 10 12 22 0.846
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 18 1 5 6 0.333
2005-06 UMass Dartmouth D3 ECAC SR 29 4 10 14 0.483
2004-05 UMass Dartmouth D3 ECAC JR 15 5 6 11 0.733
2003-04 UMass Dartmouth D3 ECAC SO 26 13 12 25 0.962
2002-03 UMass Dartmouth D3 ECAC FR 10 2 0 2 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13010
Forward overall
#528
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.