← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Kimball Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Millbrook NE-Prep 29 3 3 6 0.207 0.0417 0.0417 0.0947 0.0947
2019-20 Millbrook NE-Prep 32 19 10 29 0.906 0.1827 0.1827 0.4148 0.4148
2020-21 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Seahawks Hockey EHL 26 9 20 29 1.115 0.2394 0.2301 0.5462 0.5249
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 19 0 1 1 0.053
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 10 1 0 1 0.100
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 3 1 1 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2022-23 · Lake Forest
+269.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23430
Forward overall
#867
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2018-19
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.