← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Christy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 33 5 4 9 0.273 0.1051 0.1023 0.3969 0.3865
2018-19 NAHL 60 21 29 50 0.833 0.3062 0.2874 0.8795 0.8255
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 University of New England D3 CNE 30 13 17 30 1.000
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE 25 17 17 34 1.360
2019-20 University of New England D1 CNE FR 19 5 7 12 0.632
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE FR 19 5 7 12 0.632
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2019-20 · University of New England
+245.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19868
Forward overall
#950
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.