IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Foley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 29 15 19 34 1.172 0.2516 0.2390 0.5741 0.5454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 16 4 5 9 0.562
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 27 16 18 34 1.259
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 25 14 18 32 1.280
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 6 4 3 7 1.167
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 31 10 12 22 0.710
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2019-20 · Franklin Pierce
+246.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14433
Forward overall
#510
Forward born in 1998
#66
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Gauthier
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Martin
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Mismash
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.