IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vadim Vasjonkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-30 Country: Estonia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 29 3 11 14 0.483 0.1450 0.1456 0.3977 0.3994
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 18 16 34 0.829 0.2490 0.2379 0.6831 0.6527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 26 12 13 25 0.962
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 21 9 7 16 0.762
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 27 9 15 24 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2017-18 · Buffalo State
+416.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19408
Forward overall
#796
Forward born in 1996
#90
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henri Spoof
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Redmon
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.