IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Francone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1980-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — OJHL 42 24 23 47 1.119 0.2743 0.2401 0.7704 0.6744
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 27 2 5 7 0.259
2003-04 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 23 7 2 9 0.391
2002-03 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 27 13 11 24 0.889
2001-02 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 24 8 6 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2001-02 · Lake Forest
+183.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13163
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 1980
#343
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Payne
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Beale
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.