IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Martini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Canmore Eagles AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2003-04 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 59 8 23 31 0.525 0.1762 0.1726 0.4862 0.4763
2004-05 — AJHL 62 26 19 45 0.726 0.2434 0.2269 0.6717 0.6260
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 29 15 15 30 1.034
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 28 9 9 18 0.643
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 26 9 7 16 0.615
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 26 17 14 31 1.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.19
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+579.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26482
Forward overall
#764
Forward born in 1984
#767
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Logar
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Stirzinger
Aurora · 2015-16
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neal Sheehan
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.