IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Logar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Niagara Falls PowerHawks NA3HL 47 26 53 79 1.681 0.2025 0.2010 0.5310 0.5270
2017-18 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0619 0.0589 0.1765 0.1679
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC GR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 23 7 4 11 0.478
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 24 2 6 8 0.333
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · Buffalo State
+222.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17594
Forward overall
#725
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Moore
Becker · 2016-17
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Johansson
Amherst · 2014-15
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emerson Mish
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.