← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Logar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Niagara Falls PowerHawks NA3HL 47 26 53 79 1.681 0.2110 0.2094 0.5307 0.5267
2017-18 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0582 0.1760 0.1675
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC GR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 23 7 4 11 0.478
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC SO 24 2 6 8 0.333
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 24 2 6 8 0.333
2018-19 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · Buffalo State
+215.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8223
Forward overall
#375
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.