IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tayler Munson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0531 0.0599 0.1513 0.1707
2010-11 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 53 18 30 48 0.906 0.3363 0.3623 0.9590 1.0332
2011-12 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 55 15 31 46 0.836 0.3106 0.3193 0.8856 0.9104
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 13 0 4 4 0.308 0.1959 0.1840 0.9221 0.8659
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 56 24 34 58 1.036 0.3846 0.3568 1.0966 1.0173
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alaska D1 WCHA SR 32 8 6 14 0.438
2016-17 Alaska D1 WCHA JR 28 4 8 12 0.429
2015-16 Alaska D1 WCHA SO 35 7 5 12 0.343
2014-15 Alaska D1 WCHA FR 31 7 4 11 0.355
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2014-15 · Alaska
+44.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13810
Forward overall
#509
Forward born in 1993
#915
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.