IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 59 15 28 43 0.729 0.2062 0.2094 0.4592 0.4663
2006-07 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 62 38 49 87 1.403 0.3970 0.3845 0.8842 0.8564
2007-08 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 59 44 67 111 1.881 0.5322 0.4868 1.1855 1.0844
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 28 10 15 25 0.893
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 27 10 10 20 0.741
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 28 7 14 21 0.750
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 26 4 10 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2008-09 · St. Scholastica
+41.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4860
Forward overall
#209
Forward born in 1987
#28
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Black
SUNY Potsdam · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Wold
Utica · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Reed
Curry · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.