IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayson Alegria Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 24 9 5 14 0.583 0.1156 0.1156 0.2658 0.2658
2022-23 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 30 14 16 30 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 0.4556 0.4556
2023-24 — CCHL 56 11 20 31 0.554 0.1201 0.1152 0.4283 0.4107
2024-25 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 51 28 79 1.436 0.3116 0.2847 1.1113 1.0155
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 21 8 8 16 0.762
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2025-26 · Bowdoin
+310.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13581
Forward overall
#627
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.