IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Shade Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 56 15 18 33 0.589 0.2294 0.2315 0.8594 0.8672
2006-07 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 60 24 35 59 0.983 0.3827 0.3656 1.4339 1.3700
2007-08 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 54 12 27 39 0.722 0.2811 0.2534 1.0532 0.9495
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 27 12 16 28 1.037
2010-11 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 25 8 17 25 1.000
2009-10 Wentworth D3 — SO 26 8 19 27 1.038
2008-09 Wentworth D3 — FR 27 11 27 38 1.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.41
2008-09 · Wentworth
+451.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10324
Forward overall
#434
Forward born in 1987
#765
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.