IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cullen Bradshaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Brooks Bandits AJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Brooks Bandits AJHL 59 7 25 32 0.542 0.1812 0.1842 0.5035 0.5120
2009-10 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 28 37 65 1.083 0.3618 0.3494 1.0056 0.9711
2010-11 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 60 30 33 63 1.050 0.4087 0.3731 1.5312 1.3977
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 11 21 32 1.143
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 32 15 27 42 1.312
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 13 14 27 0.931
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 8 22 30 0.968
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2011-12 · St. Norbert
+210.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7883
Forward overall
#320
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Ochterbeck
Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Belger
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Inger
New England College · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.