IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Ochterbeck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 14 15 29 0.659 0.1523 0.1528 0.3225 0.3235
2017-18 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 41 43 45 88 2.146 0.4958 0.4698 1.0502 0.9951
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SR 24 3 9 12 0.500
2020-21 Curry D1 CNE JR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE JR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2019-20 Curry D1 CNE SO 26 15 20 35 1.346
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE SO 26 15 20 35 1.346
2018-19 Curry D1 CNE FR 26 7 10 17 0.654
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE FR 26 7 10 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2018-19 · Curry
+122.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 27 comparables)

26%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
4%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5034
Forward overall
#252
Forward born in 1997
#11
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Goudreau
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Francis Rose
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Besinger
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.