IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Goudreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 16 13 29 0.500 0.1837 0.1904 0.5278 0.5471
2014-15 — NAHL 22 4 6 10 0.455 0.1670 0.1644 0.4797 0.4721
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 22 8 12 20 0.909
2016-17 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 18 10 5 15 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2016-17 · Southern New Hampshire
+457.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19966
Forward overall
#747
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Prattson
Trinity · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Erb
Concordia · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.