IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Prattson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 13 16 29 0.592 0.2413 0.2513 0.4757 0.4955
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 48 21 26 47 0.979 0.3992 0.3930 0.7871 0.7749
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 24 9 5 14 0.583
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 25 6 11 17 0.680
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trinity D1 NESCAC FR 25 6 6 12 0.480
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 25 6 6 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Trinity
+66.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5748
Forward overall
#240
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Davis
Neumann · 2012-13
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Power
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Berglund
Manhattanville · 2013-14
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.