IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Prattson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 13 16 29 0.592 0.1668 0.1737 0.4791 0.4990
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 48 21 26 47 0.979 0.2759 0.2716 0.7928 0.7805
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 24 9 5 14 0.583
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 25 6 11 17 0.680
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 25 6 6 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Trinity
+141.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16580
Forward overall
#608
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kemp
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Ouellette
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.