IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robbie Payne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Soo Eagles NOJHL 49 39 29 68 1.388 0.2340 0.2528 0.5766 0.6230
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 59 26 29 55 0.932 0.3461 0.3591 0.9870 1.0241
2012-13 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 57 29 35 64 1.123 0.4169 0.4116 1.1888 1.1738
2013-14 — USHL 47 14 11 25 0.532 0.3387 0.3055 1.5939 1.4375
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 43 24 10 34 0.791
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 39 13 16 29 0.744
2015-16 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 38 12 8 20 0.526
2014-15 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 38 5 6 11 0.289
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2014-15 · Northern Michigan
-2.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6792
Forward overall
#259
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Schneider
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Inger
New England College · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.