IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Inger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 26 13 6 19 0.731 0.2042 0.2036 0.5043 0.5029
2016-17 — NAHL 17 3 2 5 0.294 0.1092 0.1067 0.3114 0.3042
2017-18 Metro Jets NA3HL 45 41 52 93 2.067 0.2490 0.2285 0.6529 0.5992
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 25 12 14 26 1.040
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 10 6 5 11 1.100
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 26 14 15 29 1.115
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 26 4 14 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2018-19 · New England College
+349.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20440
Forward overall
#856
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Berglund
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Fea
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kilty
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.