IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Boisjoli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-03-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 57 10 22 32 0.561 0.1438 0.1475 0.4232 0.4341
2001-02 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 60 17 45 62 1.033 0.2647 0.2587 0.7789 0.7613
2002-03 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 59 33 48 81 1.373 0.3517 0.3248 1.0349 0.9558
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 17 9 26 0.839
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 32 9 14 23 0.719
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 27 11 11 22 0.815
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 23 6 4 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2003-04 · St. Norbert
+70.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13649
Forward overall
#447
Forward born in 1982
#84
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Olinyk
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cooper Board
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.