← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Board Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 39 28 29 57 1.462 0.1912 0.1912 0.4960 0.4960
2020-21 EHL 25 15 16 31 1.240 0.2864 0.2864 0.6067 0.6067
2021-22 Seacoast Spartans EHL 35 13 28 41 1.171 0.2706 0.2604 0.5732 0.5517
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 22 7 15 22 1.000
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 26 10 9 19 0.731
2023-24 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 27 7 9 16 0.593
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 27 15 7 22 0.815
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2022-23 · Westfield State
+265.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7871
Forward overall
#337
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.