IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Boby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 53 9 8 17 0.321 0.1191 0.1180 0.3397 0.3365
2012-13 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 56 17 18 35 0.625 0.2321 0.2182 0.6617 0.6222
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC SR 21 4 7 11 0.524
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2014-15 Utica D3 UCHC SO 20 2 5 7 0.350
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC FR 17 7 8 15 0.882
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2013-14 · Utica
+478.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22105
Forward overall
#959
Forward born in 1992
#2255
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Lison
Bowdoin · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Keaney
Neumann · 2008-09
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neal Sheehan
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.