IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Krapian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Stars NA3HL 45 22 21 43 0.956 0.1057 0.1041 0.3027 0.2982
2017-18 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 40 25 33 58 1.450 0.1636 0.1539 0.4933 0.4639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Post D2 NE10 — 25 10 6 16 0.640
2019-20 Post D1 — SO 26 4 3 7 0.269
2019-20 Post D2 NE10 — 26 4 3 7 0.269
2018-19 Post D1 — FR 21 2 7 9 0.429
2018-19 Post D2 NE10 — 21 2 7 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2018-19 · Post
+273.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10295
Forward overall
#471
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Mead
Becker · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Nelson
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Huppert
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.