IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Coquitlam Express BCHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0385 0.0415 0.1455 0.1569
2012-13 Brooks Bandits AJHL 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.1342 0.1384 0.3702 0.3818
2013-14 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 14 14 28 0.467 0.1565 0.1533 0.4319 0.4231
2014-15 Brooks Bandits AJHL 59 25 28 53 0.898 0.3013 0.2792 0.8313 0.7702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC — 17 4 4 8 0.471
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC — 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2015-16 · Utica
+164.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26272
Forward overall
#1017
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Davis Kinne
Salem State · 2023-24
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Hamel
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.