← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Hamel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 NAHL 42 4 3 7 0.167 0.0592 0.0592 0.1750 0.1750
2020-21 Charleston Colonials USPHL-Premier 38 23 25 48 1.263 0.1425 0.1425 0.4297 0.4297
2021-22 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 27 11 21 32 1.185 0.1337 0.1255 0.5250 0.4987
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE SR 26 5 10 15 0.577
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE 26 5 12 17 0.654
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC 18 5 3 8 0.444
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC 23 5 10 15 0.652
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2022-23 · Arcadia
+478.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13475
Forward overall
#602
Forward born in 2001
#544
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.