IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Savva Smirnov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-27 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0852 0.1631 0.1805
2019-20 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 44 14 29 43 0.977 0.2258 0.2258 0.4782 0.4782
2020-21 Kapitan Stupino MHL-RU 54 8 15 23 0.426 0.2167 0.2167 1.1412 1.1412
2021-22 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 42 14 39 53 1.262 0.2915 0.2832 0.6174 0.5997
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10955
Forward overall
#497
Forward born in 2001
#117
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Bote
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawson MacDougall
Hobart · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Brink
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.