← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lawson MacDougall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Cornwall Colts CCHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0241 0.0259 0.0860 0.0924
2013-14 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 5 8 13 0.228 0.0495 0.0507 0.1765 0.1807
2014-15 Cornwall Colts CCHL 58 5 15 20 0.345 0.0748 0.0731 0.2668 0.2609
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 51 15 26 41 0.804 0.1744 0.1621 0.6220 0.5782
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hobart D1 SUNYAC SR 28 7 17 24 0.857
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 28 7 17 24 0.857
2018-19 Hobart D1 SUNYAC JR 28 9 12 21 0.750
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 28 9 12 21 0.750
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 28 5 20 25 0.893
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 20 6 9 15 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2016-17 · Hobart
+592.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33682
Forward overall
#1370
Forward born in 1995
#783
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.