IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lawson MacDougall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Cornwall Colts CCHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0317 0.0340 0.0860 0.0924
2013-14 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 5 8 13 0.228 0.0651 0.0667 0.1766 0.1808
2014-15 Cornwall Colts CCHL 58 5 15 20 0.345 0.0984 0.0962 0.2669 0.2610
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 51 15 26 41 0.804 0.2294 0.2132 0.6223 0.5785
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 28 7 17 24 0.857
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 28 9 12 21 0.750
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 28 5 20 25 0.893
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 20 6 9 15 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2016-17 · Hobart
+426.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27608
Forward overall
#1121
Forward born in 1995
#947
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Carlson
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilson Northey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.