IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Antoine Bélisle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 56 14 25 39 0.696 0.1988 0.2043 0.5391 0.5541
2017-18 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 19 32 51 0.850 0.2426 0.2368 0.6580 0.6424
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 47 21 29 50 1.064 0.2998 0.2834 0.8613 0.8141
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 19 1 6 7 0.368
2021-22 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 16 3 5 8 0.500
2020-21 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 22 3 9 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2019-20 · Middlebury
+140.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13765
Forward overall
#477
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2008-09
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Albano
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Simons
Endicott · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.