IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landry Schmuck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1858 0.1858 0.2695 0.2695
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 54 11 11 22 0.407 0.1614 0.1703 0.4277 0.4512
2022-23 — NAHL 54 9 8 17 0.315 0.1247 0.1254 0.3305 0.3324
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 17 13 30 0.517 0.2049 0.1963 0.5430 0.5202
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 28 11 18 29 1.036
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA — 28 31 13 44 1.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.57
2024-25 · Aurora
+992.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33248
Forward overall
#2017
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kenny Matheson
Hamilton · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeffrey Beck
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Watson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.