← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landry Schmuck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1359 0.1359 0.2679 0.2679
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 54 11 11 22 0.407 0.1497 0.1579 0.4300 0.4536
2022-23 NAHL 54 9 8 17 0.315 0.1157 0.1164 0.3323 0.3342
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 17 13 30 0.517 0.1900 0.1820 0.5459 0.5230
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 28 11 18 29 1.036
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA 28 31 13 44 1.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.57
2024-25 · Aurora
+1078.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32915
Forward overall
#1984
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2022-23
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.