IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kenny Matheson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-07-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Brockville Braves CCHL 62 23 28 51 0.823 0.1784 0.1728 0.6364 0.6164
2011-12 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0708 0.0644 0.3604 0.3277
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 22 3 4 7 0.318
2014-15 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 25 9 11 20 0.800
2013-14 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 23 8 13 21 0.913
2012-13 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 9 2 6 8 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2012-13 · Hamilton
+864.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36211
Forward overall
#1265
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Don Rankin
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Beckstead
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Hamel
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.