IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Wahlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Austin Bruins NAHL 57 13 27 40 0.702 0.2606 0.2595 0.7431 0.7400
2012-13 Austin Bruins NAHL 52 20 49 69 1.327 0.4927 0.4659 1.4049 1.3286
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Hamline D3 MIAC — 26 7 21 28 1.077
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 24 4 7 11 0.458
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 26 11 21 32 1.231
2013-14 UMass D1 — — 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2013-14 · UMass
-60.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5467
Forward overall
#238
Forward born in 1992
#91
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Sharkey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Caron
Saint Michael's · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Flory
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.