IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Sharkey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 46 12 18 30 0.652 0.2422 0.2557 0.6905 0.7290
2011-12 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 54 11 19 30 0.556 0.2063 0.2076 0.5883 0.5921
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 32 37 69 1.169 0.4342 0.4152 1.2383 1.1841
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 29 9 23 32 1.103
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 31 19 19 38 1.226
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 29 16 16 32 1.103
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 29 15 18 33 1.138
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.14
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+300.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9278
Forward overall
#396
Forward born in 1992
#344
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Hatton
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.