IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Brink Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 17 13 30 0.667 0.1871 0.1892 0.5482 0.5543
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 19 21 40 0.909 0.2552 0.2456 0.7475 0.7193
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Geneseo D1 — SR 25 6 11 17 0.680
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 25 6 11 17 0.680
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 24 5 6 11 0.458
2016-17 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 26 11 6 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2016-17 · SUNY Geneseo
+242.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24427
Forward overall
#936
Forward born in 1995
#60
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor MacDonell
Stevenson · 2021-22
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devan Sheth
Assumption · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.