← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devan Sheth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 32 1 13 14 0.438 0.0326 0.0339 0.1002 0.1041
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 38 14 17 31 0.816 0.0608 0.0596 0.1869 0.1834
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 40 17 24 41 1.025 0.1156 0.1079 0.3487 0.3256
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 28 16 11 27 0.964
2019-20 Assumption D1 SO 22 2 15 17 0.773
2019-20 Assumption D2 NE10 22 2 15 17 0.773
2018-19 Assumption D1 FR 27 9 10 19 0.704
2018-19 Assumption D2 NE10 27 9 10 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2018-19 · Assumption
+828.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25637
Forward overall
#1157
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.