IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor MacDonell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 29 16 18 34 1.172 0.2516 0.2516 0.5741 0.5741
2021-22 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 13 2 3 5 0.385 0.1098 0.1024 0.2977 0.2777
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 27 5 3 8 0.296
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 20 5 3 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2022-23 · Stevenson
+356.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17395
Forward overall
#595
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Flynn
Babson · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Cherneski
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alan Boozer
Johnson & Wales · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.