IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Flynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 29 6 10 16 0.552 0.1657 0.1766 0.4544 0.4843
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 14 28 42 0.977 0.2933 0.2982 0.8045 0.8180
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 18 19 37 0.881 0.2646 0.2561 0.7257 0.7025
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 6 2 4 6 1.000
2019-20 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 23 6 15 21 0.913
2018-19 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 20 11 6 17 0.850
2017-18 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 27 1 14 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2017-18 · Babson
+137.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13677
Forward overall
#535
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Duston Hebebrand
Adrian · 2010-11
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.