IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Radetic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 8 8 16 0.314 0.1165 0.1222 0.3321 0.3485
2016-17 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 51 16 17 33 0.647 0.2403 0.2391 0.6851 0.6816
2017-18 — NAHL 56 23 21 44 0.786 0.2917 0.2758 0.8319 0.7866
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 — JR 9 2 4 6 0.667
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 — SO 28 11 9 20 0.714
2018-19 St. Thomas D3 — FR 26 14 9 23 0.885
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2018-19 · St. Thomas
+295.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16139
Forward overall
#663
Forward born in 1997
#1258
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dallas Marvin
Bethel · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jarrett Cammarata
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Lortie
Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.